The Three Types of USMCA Origin Rules
1. Wholly Obtained or Produced (Criterion A)
The simplest origin rule applies to goods that are wholly obtained or produced entirely within the USMCA territory. This category covers natural resources extracted or harvested from the territory (minerals, agricultural products, fish), goods produced from exclusively originating materials, and waste or scrap derived from production within the territory. Criterion A applies primarily to raw materials and agricultural goods. Manufactured products with any non-originating inputs cannot qualify under this criterion.
2. Tariff Shift (Criterion C — Most Common)
The tariff shift rule is the most widely applicable origin criterion for manufactured goods. It requires that the product's HTS classification changed at a specified level as a result of manufacturing or processing in a USMCA country. The level of shift required depends on the product-specific rule: a chapter shift (CC) means the finished product must fall under a different 2-digit HTS chapter than all non-originating inputs; a heading shift (CTH) requires a different 4-digit heading; and a subheading shift (CTSH) requires a different 6-digit subheading.
The tariff shift test is objective and verifiable: either the HTS classification changed or it did not. This makes it more predictable than the substantial transformation test used for non-preferential origin determinations. However, it requires precise HTS classification of both the finished product and all non-originating inputs used in its production. An error in either classification can produce an incorrect origin determination. For companies importing from Mexico, accurate tariff classification of inputs is just as important as classification of the finished product.
3. Regional Value Content (RVC)
Some product-specific rules require that a minimum percentage of the product's value originate within the USMCA territory. This is measured through a regional value content (RVC) calculation using one of two methods. The transaction value method calculates RVC as: (TV − VNM) / TV x 100, where TV is the transaction value of the good and VNM is the value of non-originating materials. The net cost method calculates RVC as: (NC − VNM) / NC x 100, where NC is the net cost of the good (total cost minus sales promotion, marketing, after-sales service costs, royalties, shipping, and packing costs that are not allocated to the good).
The minimum RVC threshold varies by product and method. Under the transaction value method, thresholds typically range from 50% to 75%. Under the net cost method, thresholds are generally lower, ranging from 40% to 50%, because the denominator excludes certain costs. Importers can choose whichever method produces a qualifying result. For products with high non-originating material costs, the net cost method often provides a better path to qualification because it excludes non-production costs from the denominator, increasing the resulting RVC percentage.
Many product-specific rules require both a tariff shift and an RVC threshold. In these cases, the product must satisfy both requirements simultaneously. A product that meets the tariff shift requirement but falls short of the RVC threshold does not qualify, and vice versa.